logo

How to File a Medical Malpractice Case

A malpractice attorneys case is one in which medical professionals fail to treat a patient according with the accepted standards of care. For example when an orthopedic surgeon makes a mistake during surgery, which causes damage to the nerves of the femoral area, this could be considered medical malpractice.

Duty of care

All medical professionals are subject to obligations to care that result from the doctor-patient relationship. This includes taking reasonable measures to avoid injury or cure a patient's illness. The doctor should also inform the patient of any risks that may arise from treatment or procedure. If a doctor fails to inform the patient about risks that are well-known to the profession could be liable for malpractice.

A medical professional who fails to meet their duty of care is liable for negligence, and is required to pay damages to the plaintiff. This element of the case has to be proved by showing that the defendant's conduct or lack of actions fell below the standard of how other medical professionals would do in similar circumstances. This is usually proven by expert testimony.

A medical professional who is familiar with the pertinent practices and kinds of tests to be conducted to determine the presence of an illness could testify the defendant's actions were in violation of the standard of care. They can also explain to jurors in plain language the reason why the standard of care was violated.

Not all medical experts are qualified to handle the malpractice cases, therefore an experienced attorney must be able to locate and work with expert witnesses. In the case of complex cases it might be necessary for the expert to submit detailed reports and be available to appear in court.

Breach of duty

The definition of the standard of care and showing that the medical professional violated it is the premise of all malpractice cases. This is typically accomplished by seeking expert evidence from doctors with similar qualifications, training and knowledge as the negligent physician.

The norm of care is basically what other medical professionals in your situation would offer to treat you. Doctors are required by their patients to treat them with caution and in a reasonable manner. The duty of care also extends to their patients' loved ones. However, this does not mean that medical professionals aren't required to be good samaritans outside of the hospital.

When the medical professional breaches their duty of care and you're harmed, they are responsible for your injuries. The plaintiff must also establish that the breach directly caused their injury. For instance, if the surgeon in the defendant's chart and operates on the wrong leg, causing an injury, it's likely that they were negligent.

It is important to keep in mind that it can be difficult to determine the root source of your injury. It is difficult to prove that a surgical sponge left over after gallbladder surgery caused the patient's injuries.

Causation

A doctor may be held accountable for malpractice only if a patient proves that the physician's negligence directly caused injury. This is referred to as "causation." It is important to keep in mind that a negative outcome from an intervention does not automatically constitute medical malpractice. The plaintiff must also show that the doctor erred from the standard of care normally applied in similar cases.

A doctor has a responsibility to inform a patient about all possible risks and outcomes including the rate of success of a procedure. If a patient is not fully informed about the potential risks, they may choose to defer the procedure in favor of an alternative. This is referred to as the duty of informed permission.

The legal system's framework for handling medical malpractice claims evolved from 19th century English common law, and it is governed by court rulings and legislative statutes which differ between states.

The procedure of suing a doctor involves filing an official complaint, or summons in a state court. This document outlines the claimed wrongs, and seeks compensation for harms caused by the physician's actions. The attorney for the plaintiff has to schedule a deposition under oath of the defendant doctor that allows the plaintiff to give testimony. The deposition will be recorded and used as evidence at the trial.

Damages

A patient who believes that a physician has committed medical malpractice could bring an action in a court. A plaintiff must prove that there are four elements that constitute an action for malpractice that is valid which include a legal obligation to act in accordance with the standards of the profession, a breach of the obligation, a harm caused by this breach, and damages that can be reasonably connected to the injuries.

Medical malpractice cases require experts testimony. In most cases, the attorney for the defendant will be involved in discovery, where the parties request written interrogatories or requests for the production of documents. The opposing party is expected to answer these questions and demands under an oath. The process can be a long and drawn-out one, and lawyers for both sides will have experts to provide evidence.

The plaintiff also has to prove that the negligence caused significant damages. It can be costly to pursue a negligence claim. If the damage is small then it might not be worthwhile to file an action. Additionally, the amount of the damages must be greater than the amount of bringing the suit. It is therefore important that a patient consults a Board Certified legal malpractice lawyer before bringing a lawsuit. After a trial, either winner or the losing party can appeal the decision of the lower court. During an appeal the higher court will scrutinize the evidence and determine if the lower court committed any errors in the law or in the facts.